I am not saying society is better either. Langham commited a crime & done his time. I would not want him near my younng children but other than that, fine.

Quote: M Lewis @ April 28 2008, 7:09 PM BST

Ahh, see that's very sensible. Certainly a change from earlier where you said you would kill someone for doing the same over a photo.

You cant make an incredibly outlandish and nonsensicle statement, arguing the merits of that point for 3 pages and then summarise and justify your position by altering your point. Well, you can...but it makes you look a bit silly.

View original

Actually I did not say that at all.
I said if anyone hurt my boys I would kill them. You should learn to read.

Spot the Dog is always a good book for that.

Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 5:49 PM BST

if someone was getting off on a pic of my kids (As children) I would kill them.

View original

I belive the phrase is......DOOOOOOH!

I would. We were talking about the Langham case.
If some c**t had abused my child & put those images on the internet for other sadistic arseholes to get off on. I would kill them. I would kill the person who abused my child & the person getting off on it.

How would I know if an innocent pic of my son in his schoiol uniform was getting some fella off. I would'nt. However if by some miracle it was discovered. IE I caught him sat in a chair rubbing his hard cock all over my young sons photo I would still kill him.

Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 5:49 PM BST

I dont give a f**k what people do with my picture. I am an adult & I understand the complex sexual nature of Humans. However if someone was getting off on a pic of my kids (As children) I would kill them.

View original

Can't you just cut his cock off?
Then you'd probably get a shorter sentence.

Quote: M Lewis @ April 28 2008, 6:51 PM BST

I am just curious where you draw the line. As someone who stated they understood human sexuality and also said they would kill people you seem a mix of contradictions.

I asked about clothing as you said "child porn is illegal" -, but Gap modeling isnt. I know its all hypothetical, but do you think someone getting aroused by Gap models in the kids section needs to be killed?

View original

It is so hypothetical it is ridiculous. How are you going to know some guy gets off on Kays Catalogue's Childrenswear section. Is he going to tell me. I think not.
Is he going to get charged with & arrested over it. I think not. We are talking images of children being raped. You are talking child models & gap clothing. You are very strange.

Quote: zooo @ April 28 2008, 7:21 PM BST

Can't you just cut his cock off?
Then you'd probably get a shorter sentence.

View original

Nah. My instinct would be to kill. He would just get off by shoving his fingers up his arse if he had no cock.

Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 7:21 PM BST

I would. We were talking about the Langham case.

View original

Not quite true now is it.

You said "if a man was to take piccies of your kids at a swimming pool & wank off to them, you will be just dandy O with it. Its ok, its just his sexual desire. He aint hurting anyone."

I siad "i'm not sure i care. Or need to care, if it were that simple. Your picture is on the net, do you feel degraded knowing that some people may have sex with chickens while looking at it"

You said" I dont give a f**k what people do with my picture. I am an adult & I understand the complex sexual nature of Humans. However if someone was getting off on a pic of my kids (As children) I would kill them. "

Feel free to argue with me, but dont think you can make stuff up and not have me point it out.

Quote: Charley @ April 28 2008, 7:25 PM BST

We are talking images of children being raped.

View original

Then your kids went to some pretty rough swimming lessons.

Quote: M Lewis @ April 28 2008, 7:26 PM BST

Not quite true now is it.

You said "if a man was to take piccies of your kids at a swimming pool & wank off to them, you will be just dandy O with it. Its ok, its just his sexual desire. He aint hurting anyone."

I siad "i'm not sure i care. Or need to care, if it were that simple. Your picture is on the net, do you feel degraded knowing that some people may have sex with chickens while looking at it"

You said" I dont give a f**k what people do with my picture. I am an adult & I understand the complex sexual nature of Humans. However if someone was getting off on a pic of my kids (As children) I would kill them. "

Feel free to argue with me, but dont think you can make stuff up and not have me point it out.

View original

Exactly.
I asked you a question about a guy zooming in on your particular child/children.
You said you didn't care. I said well I would. If some guy was zooming in on my particular child & getting off on it I would kill him.

Are you scared for some strange reason MLewis?
Have you been taking pictures you shouldnt?

Quote: M Lewis @ April 28 2008, 7:28 PM BST

Then your kids went to some pretty rough swimming lessons.

View original

And you were there filming I take it.

Quote: zooo @ April 28 2008, 7:21 PM BST

Then you'd probably get a shorter sentence.

View original

The words 'Charley' and 'shorter sentence' are a God send, really.

It'd mean not having to witness such Daily Mail waving over-reaction and excitement.

Padeophiles don't half get people excited, do they? Jesus.

It is not over reaction if you feel strongly about something.
I do not call anyone who feels passionate about something an overactor. I just agree or disagree. We each have the right to an opinion. This is mine. I have a good reason for my opinion & no f**ker is going to change it.

Exactly. You've both said your piece, and I'm sure you're getting sick of this conversation by now.

I insist we talk about something nice. Like squirrels.
Or Chris Langham.

I am bored now anyway.
Eastenders is on in a mo.

Steven might kiss Christian again!

Yea. I liked that.

I think he should shag him now.

Cor. Me too.
He's leaving soon though.
So they must get in all the kissing and shagging they can.

Who! Christian or Steven?