What are you watching on TV? Page 2172

AvatarBCG Supporter

Chappers

  • Tuesday 26th November 2019, 10:46pm
  • Surreyish., England
  • 30,576 posts

Wrong arm of the law on Talking Pictures.

AvatarBCG Supporter

Chappers

  • Thursday 28th November 2019, 9:10pm [Edited]
  • Surreyish., England
  • 30,576 posts

Joan Collins doing a striptease on the underground in the Human Jungle on TPTV.

Avatar

chipolata

  • Saturday 30th November 2019, 10:30am
  • England
  • 29,826 posts

Finally got round to watching A Very English Scandal. Brilliant stuff, especially Hugh Grant, who has developed into a cracking character actor. I particularly enjoyed the fact that Jeremy Thorpe had to resign because he was caught in a lie. You really wouldn't get that now.

Avatar

lofthouse

  • Saturday 30th November 2019, 9:37pm
  • Nowhere, England
  • 9,041 posts

New Vic & Bobs big night out

Judge Nutmeg is back!

Avatar

Rood Eye

  • Sunday 1st December 2019, 7:41pm [Edited]
  • England
  • 3,218 posts

I'm watching the ITV Election Debate in which party leaders or, in the case of the Conservative and Labour parties, substitutes for leaders who couldn't be bothered to turn up, are answering questions from the audience.

There's an awful lot of virtue signalling going on with regard to the killings on London Bridge: the speakers are spending more time expressing sympathy for the victims and their loved ones than they're spending answering the bloody questions!

Avatar

Rood Eye

  • Monday 2nd December 2019, 9:53pm [Edited]
  • England
  • 3,218 posts

I'm watching the Virginia Roberts interview on BBC's Panorama.

She's saying how she travelled all over the world with Jeffrey Epstein, in private jets, meeting the rich and the famous and generally enjoying sort of lifestyle that very few people in history have ever been able to afford.

She readily admitted in 2015 that Epstein paid her handsomely for every sexual encounter he arranged for her. She admits equally readily that Epstein paid her a five figure sum for spending the night with Andrew in London.

Despite extensive googling, I cannot find a single instance between 2019 and the dawn of civilisation of a slave being treated quite so well.

A key piece of evidence which, as far as I'm aware, has never been mentioned is the look on her face in that photograph with Andrew.

Does she look like a girl who is under threat?

Does she look like a girl who is unhappy?

To me, she looks like a girl who's having the time of her life.

Image


.

According to Panorama, the Daily Mail paid Virginia $160,000 for her story about Andrew.

Avatar

Briosaid

  • Monday 2nd December 2019, 10:26pm
  • Scotland
  • 1,138 posts

One thing I think every time I see that picture - the hand he says isn't necessarily his, is a strangely red hand like like his other strangely red hand.

Avatar

Rood Eye

  • Monday 2nd December 2019, 10:34pm
  • England
  • 3,218 posts
Quote: Briosaid @ 2nd December 2019, 10:26 PM

One thing I think every time I see that picture - the hand he says isn't necessarily his, is a strangely red hand like like his other strangely red hand.

You've caught him red-handed! Laughing out loud

Avatar

Briosaid

  • Monday 2nd December 2019, 10:58pm
  • Scotland
  • 1,138 posts

Laughing out loud And what is the significance of having strangely red hands? I've long suspected the Royals of being aliens - maybe this is the sign!

AvatarBCG Supporter

john tregorran

  • Tuesday 3rd December 2019, 12:08am
  • mornington,victoria, Australia
  • 499 posts

Perhaps it's because they've never actually used them to do work.

Avatar

Alfred J Kipper

  • Tuesday 3rd December 2019, 9:42am
  • Aldershot, England
  • 5,955 posts

I'm watching the Virginia Roberts interview on BBC's Panorama.

She's saying how she travelled all over the world with Jeffrey Epstein, in private jets, meeting the rich and the famous and generally enjoying sort of lifestyle that very few people in history have ever been able to afford.

She readily admitted in 2015 that Epstein paid her handsomely for every sexual encounter he arranged for her. She admits equally readily that Epstein paid her a five figure sum for spending the night with Andrew in London.

Despite extensive googling, I cannot find a single instance between 2019 and the dawn of civilisation of a slave being treated quite so well.

A key piece of evidence which, as far as I'm aware, has never been mentioned is the look on her face in that photograph with Andrew.

Does she look like a girl who is under threat?

Does she look like a girl who is unhappy?

To me, she looks like a girl who's having the time of her life.

Image

According to Panorama, the Daily Mail paid Virginia $160,000 for her story about Andrew.While I think he possibly gave her one, or three I do now think she's being opportunistic and probably wants a stack of cash she knows all three of her accused have. She possibly feels rejected after her youthful looks faded and made her surplus to requirements while Epstein recruited younger versions. There is little that infuriates a female more than this. And knowing that it took three hugely rich acquaintances of hers out of her scope must really wrankle if she could do with some more money.

There is also a huge flaw in her story or the way she told it. If she was so disgusted by sex with him why do it twice again at different times and places? But as I've said her lawyers will claim coercion of a minor and they will be top lawyers looking for cuts of huge payouts to the victims from his estate, he's already convicted of past offences his suicide will imply guilt of all pending cases and it's in the middle of the me too movement. Andrew needs a very astute team of lawyers if this goes to court but then he won't have any trouble getting them. I bet Charles is very cross with him though.

Avatar

Rood Eye

  • Tuesday 3rd December 2019, 11:07am [Edited]
  • England
  • 3,218 posts

I don't think Andrew will be going anywhere near court in the capacity of "defendant" as, even if everything Virginia Roberts says is the gospel truth, none of Andrew's actions was unlawful in the jurisdiction within which it took place.

The media are extremely fond of describing her as a "teenager" and a "minor" at the times of the alleged incidents but they're not quite so fond of acknowledging that, on each and every occasion, she was above the age of consent.