| Author |
Topic: Headcases |
Leevil

Moderator
Posts: 22500
Location: England
Offline
|
|
April 16, 2008, 7:51 PM GMT
|
|
But the drawings are creepy.
Quipped Leevil.
|
|
|
| |
ContainsNuts

Member
Posts: 2137
Location: England
Offline
|
|
April 16, 2008, 7:56 PM GMT
|
|
Quote: Mark @ April 15 2008, 1:57 AM BST
I still like it, some of it is lazy comedy... like the licking poo sketch (too childish to be funny) and the poor voice acting (Heather Mills doesn't sound like that)...
I thought the Morgan Freeman impression was the worst.
Sketch show online! http://www.youtube.com/user/containsnutstv
Vote us Funny: http://www.funnyordie.co.uk/containsnuts
Not so new blog online: http://containsnuts.wordpress.com/
|
|
|
| |
Retinend

Member
Posts: 202
Location: England
Offline
|
April 22, 2008, 12:49 AM GMT Edited by Retinend on April 22 2008, 12:58 AM GMT
|
|
That really wasn't Spitting Image for the naughties. The caricatures look pretty good (some more accurate than others, but a generally good standard for a British CGI comedy), but they're fairly crudely animated on a professional level - the way their mouths flap and morph looks completely unnatural, sometimes even going out of sync with the voices! The writing is unoriginal, mainly centered around glossy-mag celebrities and tabloid politics.
This week's high point was the the race between Amy Winehouse and Pete Doherty, just because the caricatures were so funny - especially Pete's pinball pupils, the low point was the street-talking Helen Mirren and Judy Dench thing. Not only was it an unfunny premise, it DIDN'T PERTAIN TO ANYTHING. It's like doing a sketch about climbing everest with Robert De Nero but talking with a Monty Python french accent. What the f**k?
|
|
|
| |
Chappers

Member
Posts: 14729
Location: England
Offline
|
|
April 22, 2008, 12:53 AM GMT
|
|
I suppose it was a bit like Beryl Reid/Queen Mother.
And why make such a big thing about Pierced Organ? He is only important in his own mind.
Yes - some of it is funny - but not really such a good ratio as Spitting Image - and what was the other one in between?
50% of something is better than 100% of nothing.
|
|
|
| |
Retinend

Member
Posts: 202
Location: England
Offline
|
|
April 22, 2008, 12:58 AM GMT
|
|
Quote: David Chapman @ April 21 2008, 9:53 PM BST
I suppose it was a bit like Beryl Reid/Queen Mother.
And why make such a big thing about Pierced Organ? He is only important in his own mind.
Yes - some of it is funny - but not really such a good ratio as Spitting Image - and what was the other one in between?
2DTV?
|
|
|
| |
Aaron

Site Editor
Posts: 58938
Location: England
Offline
|
|
April 28, 2008, 2:46 AM GMT
|
|
I really really enjoyed this week's episode. Some of the caricatures looked really good. Spot on. Voices, as ever, were dodgy. And there's no warmth to CGI. But, above all, it made me laugh. A lot.
Aaron
BCG Editor
Half man, half Internet, half TV.

|
|
|
| |
Richard Wells

Member
Posts: 792
Location: England
Offline
|
|
April 28, 2008, 3:09 AM GMT
|
|
I must admit that headcases has actually grown on me.
The first week I said it was complete crap but thankfully I've been proven wrong.
I don't like the Mirren/Dench/Winslet sketches though.
But all In all it's pretty good.
Though it'll never be as good as Spitting Image was.
|
|
|
| |
Aaron

Site Editor
Posts: 58938
Location: England
Offline
|
|
April 28, 2008, 3:10 AM GMT
|
|
Quote: Richard Wells @ April 28 2008, 12:09 AM BST
I don't like the Mirren/Dench/Winslet sketches though.
No, there's not a single redeeming feature about those.
Well, apart from the fact that they end.
Aaron
BCG Editor
Half man, half Internet, half TV.

|
|
|
| |
Richard Wells

Member
Posts: 792
Location: England
Offline
|
|
April 28, 2008, 3:13 AM GMT
|
|
I did miss my fix of old mugabe though.
|
|
|
| |
Aaron

Site Editor
Posts: 58938
Location: England
Offline
|
|
April 28, 2008, 3:22 AM GMT
|
|
Yes, I really loved those ones. Particularly the first, back in episode one. I laughed. A lot.
Aaron
BCG Editor
Half man, half Internet, half TV.

|
|
|
| |
deian

Member
Posts: 66
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 1, 2008, 7:28 PM GMT
|
|
does anyone know if they are taking outside contributions at all?
gave 2dtv a bash and wouldn't mind a go at this one too.
"But where do all the calculators go?"
|
|
|
| |
Aaron

Site Editor
Posts: 58938
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 2, 2008, 2:56 AM GMT
|
|
As far as I'm aware, no, they're not. I'd hazard a guess that, due to the production's nature, there's only a limited amount of stuff that they can do, so will keep it in-house.
And pleeeeease use capitals!
Aaron
BCG Editor
Half man, half Internet, half TV.

|
|
|
| |
Seefacts

Member
Posts: 4235
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 2, 2008, 3:03 AM GMT
|
|
Quote: Perry Nium @ April 7 2008, 12:08 PM BST
You obviously haven't seen this advert. Now THAT'S bad CGI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YozMDzOAGxk
It saddens me to think I missed this link.
That's quite brilliant.
Remember me kindly . . .
That I was merely a twat, rather than a massive twat.
|
|
|
| |
deian

Member
Posts: 66
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 3, 2008, 3:09 AM GMT
|
|
Quote: Aaron @ May 1 2008, 11:56 PM BST
As far as I'm aware, no, they're not. I'd hazard a guess that, due to the production's nature, there's only a limited amount of stuff that they can do, so will keep it in-house.
And pleeeeease use capitals!
bugga.
and, NEVER!
no, wait, damn!
"But where do all the calculators go?"
|
|
|
| |
Aaron

Site Editor
Posts: 58938
Location: England
Offline
|
|
May 3, 2008, 3:14 AM GMT
|
|
It's in the rules.
Aaron
BCG Editor
Half man, half Internet, half TV.

|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|