| Author |
Topic: Have I Got News For You - Series 42 |
Ian Wolf

Member
Posts: 2701
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 17, 2011, 1:04 PM BST
|
|
I hope everyone enjoyed last night's extended HIGNFY. I couldn't because we had a documentary about the Newcastle Metro on BBC One North East instead.
My petition: Get QI Series D and onwards released on DVD
Offical QI Newshound
|
|
|
| |
Will Cam

Member
Posts: 5000
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 17, 2011, 1:18 PM BST
|
|
iPlayer dear boy, iPlayer!
Doing a Bussell for a bit but will be back - probably.
|
|
|
| |
Ian Wolf

Member
Posts: 2701
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 17, 2011, 1:29 PM BST
|
|
Quote: Will Cam @ October 17 2011, 1:18 PM BST
iPlayer dear boy, iPlayer!
I know, I'm watching it now, but it's a bloody pain in the arse.
My petition: Get QI Series D and onwards released on DVD
Offical QI Newshound
|
|
|
| |
fasty

Member
Posts: 138
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 18, 2011, 5:47 AM BST
|
|
I wonder if Liam Fox's resignation was conciously timed to be announced after the show was recorded?
|
|
|
| |
cwickham

Member
Posts: 227
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 21, 2011, 11:25 PM BST
|
|
Louise Mensch really is an extraordinarily repellent person, isn't she? The completely mute audience response to everything she said was extremely satisfying (as were Paul, Danny and Ian's responses to her "arguments").
|
|
|
| |
Aaron

Site Editor
Posts: 68151
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 21, 2011, 11:33 PM BST
|
|
I won't see this week's episode until Sunday, but have always found her both witty and charming.
Aaron
BCG Editor
Half man, half Internet, half TV.

|
|
|
| |
cwickham

Member
Posts: 227
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 22, 2011, 7:39 AM BST
|
|
I would say that nobody on last night's panel (and most of the people on Twitter) would agree with you.
|
|
|
| |
fasty

Member
Posts: 138
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 22, 2011, 10:29 AM BST
|
|
One point she seemed to be trying to make, unless I mis-heard her, was that you shouldn't be campaigning/protesting against globalisation and at the same time spending your money in Starbucks?
Seems a fair point to me.
|
|
|
| |
zooo

Global Moderator
Posts: 61966
Location: England
Online
|
October 22, 2011, 11:45 AM BST Edited by zooo on October 22 2011, 11:46 AM BST
|
|
Quote: fasty @ October 22 2011, 10:29 AM BST
One point she seemed to be trying to make, unless I mis-heard her, was that you shouldn't be campaigning/protesting against globalisation and at the same time spending your money in Starbucks?
Seems a fair point to me.
Yeah I think it was too, really!
I'm sure there are plenty of little independent cafes around St Paul's where they could have spent their money.
Milton Keynes. City of dreams.
|
|
|
| |
Dr Sanchez

Member
Posts: 257
Location: England
Offline
|
October 22, 2011, 12:31 PM BST Edited by Dr Sanchez on October 22 2011, 12:33 PM BST
|
|
Her point about Starbucks was perfectly valid. It doesn't take away from the fact she's a poisonous little snake.
|
|
|
| |
fasty

Member
Posts: 138
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 22, 2011, 1:05 PM BST
|
|
Quote: Dr Sanchez @ October 22 2011, 12:31 PM BST
It doesn't take away from the fact she's a poisonous little snake.
I still would though
|
|
|
| |
Dr Sanchez

Member
Posts: 257
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 22, 2011, 1:21 PM BST
|
|
Quote: fasty @ October 22 2011, 1:05 PM BST
I still would though 
Her one redeeming feature
|
|
|
| |
zooo

Global Moderator
Posts: 61966
Location: England
Online
|
|
October 22, 2011, 1:28 PM BST
|
|
As long as you realise you 'wouldn't'.
Because she'd quite rightly tell you to f**k off.
Milton Keynes. City of dreams.
|
|
|
| |
groovydude89

Member
Posts: 531
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 22, 2011, 3:11 PM BST
|
|
I'd like to form a tripartisan coalition with Louise Mensch and Caroline Flint.
|
|
|
| |
Nogget

Member
Posts: 4824
Location: England
Offline
|
|
October 22, 2011, 3:52 PM BST
|
|
Quote: fasty @ October 22 2011, 10:29 AM BST
One point she seemed to be trying to make, unless I mis-heard her, was that you shouldn't be campaigning/protesting against globalisation and at the same time spending your money in Starbucks?
Seems a fair point to me.
Yes, she had a point, but she appeared to make it badly; part of the objections were to her extrapolating a single cup of coffee at Starbucks to mean "taking everything that capitalism provides". Her main fault, however, was to imagine that she would be treated fairly on that programme. She would have been wise to have avoided giving them any ammunition.
Never use a self-referential signature, like this one.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|