I see it starts next Friday - after Easter. And what a "Not going out" night it's going to be.
9.00 - Have I got News for you
9.30 - Ruddy Hell
10.00 - Q.I.
10.35 - Jonathan Ross (or Peep Show)
Ross or Peep Show????!!!! No contest! PEEP SHOW-best sit-com on TV.
Oh and I forgot. "My Family" is on before. I do LIKE "My Family" but don't go out of my way to watch it, whereas the others are almost "Must Watch" TV.
It's quite a good night for comedy if you think about it. HIGNFY, Ruddy Hell it's Harry & Paul, QI and Peep Show. Huzzah!
I'd go as far as to say that's the best comedy line up on TV for a long, long time. God, I'm getting excited already: good new comedy from 8:30pm right through to 11:05pm!
I've just realised I'm a tad moist. That must be a good sign.
Either that or my incontinence pants are leaking.
Reeeeally didn't need to know that mate. 
Man I really wanted to watch Q.I. but Two Pints is on BBC Three and they rarely repeat it. Damn!
Quote: ajp29 @ April 13, 2007, 12:14 PMMan I really wanted to watch Q.I. but Two Pints is on BBC Three and they rarely repeat it. Damn!
Andy - when I first read that I thought you said you were "a tad maoist" and I wondered what your Chinese political affiliations had to do with it.
rofl
Well I've just watched it and I'm not sure. A bit hit and miss but maybe judging it on their pedigrees. Morwenna excellent as usual. I liked the Antique salesman and Nelson Mandella. Not sure about U2 though.
Really happy with it!! After the HUGE disappointment of Romans Empire this was GOLD! It wasn't all Brilliant but in the face of what we've been fed recently it's a tide turner! I've got a similar show which we'll push onto our screens very shortly....... hopefully through.... ITV!!! YES them!!!
Totally share your sentriments Mark ... at long last! COMEDY!!! ;-)
Good luck Guy. Let us know how it goes.
I agree that compared to Roman's Empire it was pure class.
Well, I liked both shows. But i also found H&P a bit hit and miss in places. The surgeon sketch was a dissapointment as was Nelson Mandella. I liked the Laurel and Hardy sketch though.
Oh, and the german talking to the camera was pontless.
It's also nice to see Laura Solon getting screentime, and hopefully we'll see her more. The radio show she did was brill.
I liked the American couple, Biddidly Boing! But wasn't too keen on the impersonation sketches, although the makeup was impressive.
I thought most of the time Paul Whitehouse totally outshone Harry, especially the two surgeons bit, it just shows how good a performer Paul really is.
Friday night comedy is back, woohoo!
Watched it. I too lurrrrrrrrved the American couple, the pet geordie and the antique dealer. The rest was quite boring. Well acted by both party's and i do like that woman, whats her name. Gosh! Morwenna Banks is it?
Yes I forgot to mention those other two sketches. Yeah "what's her name" is great.
Quote: charley rance @ April 14, 2007, 12:28 AMMorwenna Banks is it?
Can't agree with most of these comments. I thought it was pathetic. Really lazy writing with sketches about cheap targets such as Mourinho, Abramovich, Bill Gates, Laurel And Hardy and Nelson Mandela.
Many of the sketches didn't even have a point to them, they just fizzled out. Take the builders for example. Talk posh, then typical builder, talk posh again. Are they going to do that every week?
I'm no great fan of Little Britain but their writing was so much better than this.
It had some funny moments, the American couple and the surgeons were the funniest parts for me. I thought the L+H sketch wasn't very funny and scarily I understood what Bill Gates was talking about!!!!! NEEEEEEERRRRDDDDDD!!!!
The performances saved it for me though, will watch again.
Who was the blonde girl/lady/woooman in the coffee shop?
Very poor, which was was a great shame. Just very lazy and not enough jokes. The pet Geordie and Antiques salesman were okay but yeah the rest of it barely raised a smile.
I have to say that I thought it was well below par. The sketches were not particularly funny with one or two exceptions.
The performances were very good particularly Paul Whitehouse - but purrrrlease never...ever...ever...ever...ever...ever...do the U2 thing again. The accents were excruciatingly terrible. I hurt my toes I was curling them up so much.
I fear that these two could do so much better and the whole thing smacks of "take the money and run"
The U2 sketch was actually embarrassing to watch. All of the 'jokes' that they made about U2 knowing only 2 chords, Bono's name being similar to a dogfood and Bono loving publicity are the sort of thing that schoolchildren talked about, with more humour, more than a decade ago.
I ve just watched it, and have to say I thought it was quite good,certainly made me laugh quite a lot; and its always good to see Paul Whittehouse on TV.
After watching the first two sketches, Jose Mouriniho and The American on the bus, I thought wow, this is going to be a classic. But the rest of the sketches weren't, the remaining 25 minutes was quite boring. The Laurel and Hardy sketch wasn't funny, it was just bad taste. I am a big fan of Harry Enfield and Chums, but this was quite poor. I will still tune in to episode 2, because you never know.
Quote: ShoePie @ April 14, 2007, 11:16 AM
It had some funny moments, the American couple and the surgeons were the funniest parts for me. I thought the L+H sketch wasn't very funny and scarily I understood what Bill Gates was talking about!!!!! NEEEEEEERRRRDDDDDD!!!!
The performances saved it for me though, will watch again.
Who was the blonde girl/lady/woooman in the coffee shop?
and beside her Morwenna Banks.
I thought at least half of it was really funny. Definitely worth watching again.
But that Laurel and Hardy thing was just wrong!
So so wrong.
Laurel and Hardy impressions were good, but the sketch itself was terrible and I think their going to get it for that. Exactly was "it" is I don't know, but L+H are very respected and it's very weird to try and make a comedy out of a comedy.
I thought the Laurel and Hardy sketch was wrong aswell, Laurel should have been recieving.
Lol.
I thought the Laurel and Hardy sketch was pretty shocking, to be honest, and shaming on one Britains greatest comedy performers. It cast a cloud on what was a pretty promising return in many ways:
pet Geordie: we all have Geordie work colleagues, especiialy in my neck of the woods, and this is priceless material for winding them up
I Saw You Coming: Thought this was going to be a Richard Curtis spoof at first, but was in fact much better than that.
U2: You are all wrong. This is the natural successor to Reeves' and Mortimer's Slade sketches and makes more than a couple of pertinent points about Mr "Let's save the world but in the meantime I forgot my favourite cowboy hat could you fly it across the Atlantic Ocean for me" Bono that frankly do not get enough airtime.
I'm hoping the coffee shop sketch is developing into something with some sort of big payoff at the end, although meanwhile I'm hoping that Roman, the posh builders and L&H don't come back too often. Mourinho was OK, and if it leads to a pout every week it might be worth it. Undecided on Biddidly Boing and the Surgeons, although Whitehouse was excellent in that. The Norwegian in the gym wasn't funny.
Morwenna Banks can have my body.
Oh yeah, I really loved that pet geordie one! 'Can I hit him?' very good. And I liked the bit where the Edge takes off his hat to reveal a relief map of, I think, Australia on his bald head! The bloke in the gym wasnt funny though.
i liked the show, i thought the first jose arroganties sketch was funny and the pet geordie mad me cry with laughter and anything that can do that is a hit in my eyes, the i saw you coming sketch was quite good, the bill gates one and the apple guy also made me laugh, definatly worth another viewing and it was very good, especially the pet geordie "oh we are lending him to the johnsons tomorow so he can mate with there philipeano maid" pint pot.
Utter, utter tripe from start to finish. Never rated Enfield as a performer as he's very untalented, but expected a heck of a lot more from Whitehouse. This was their "Attack of the Clones" in comparison to "Star Wars".
If I saw Enfield and Whitehouse in the pub I'd say "Oi! Enfield and Whitehouse! No! I admired how you latched onto the late eighties zeitgist and rescued character-based sketch shows seeding the way for imitators like Lucas and Williams to advance it to the next level of hilarity, but to foist such unfunny and lazy rubbish on an eager British comedy public on a prime TV channel at a privileged TV time, you are seriously out of order!"
It was little experiencing a Beatles re-union minus Lennon & Harrison (i.e. Charlie Higson and Kathy Burke).
Quote: ShoePie @ April 14, 2007, 11:16 AM... I understood what Bill Gates was talking about!!!!! NEEEEEEERRRRDDDDDD!!!!
I had high hopes and i was disappointed. i was expecting so much more than that, i was a huge fan of Enfield in the past, but this just left a bad taste in my mouth. Shame.
The good thing about the Mandela sketches is that they were totally out of charcter for him.
Quote: Martin Holmes @ April 14, 2007, 11:25 AMVery poor, which was was a great shame. Just very lazy and not enough jokes. The pet Geordie and Antiques salesman were okay but yeah the rest of it barely raised a smile.
...fat girl's pants...
Quote: Jack Ruby's Dog @ April 15, 2007, 9:23 AM
If I saw Enfield and Whitehouse in the pub I'd say "Oi! Enfield and Whitehouse! No! I admired how you latched onto the late eighties zeitgist and rescued character-based sketch shows seeding the way for imitators like Lucas and Williams to advance it to the next level of hilarity, but to foist such unfunny and lazy rubbish on an eager British comedy public on a prime TV channel at a privileged TV time, you are seriously out of order!"
Just saw trailers for this week's. Oh God! Looks like more of the same. I used to find Harry Enfield really funny but now I'm afraid this show doesn't raise a titter
Am I being an old git or does anybody remember when the sketch show was a collection of amusing items one after the other with little or no repetition of the characters?
Now it seems ok to turn out the same old guff week after week featuring "one trick" characters many of which are note remotely funny. Are "stars" too lazy to write many characters preferring instead to come up with 6 jokes and stretch these same jokes over a 6 week run? Good for the bank balance but as for artistic integrity?
Why can't programme makers take a chance and have intelligent varied writing instead of going with tried and tested cack all the time? And before anybody points to BBC 3. Efforts there have hardly been earth-shattering. I certainly haven't spotted the new Monty Py-thon or Fast Show among recent efforts.
Bitter and twisted? Yes most probably but I'm certainly not the only one judging by the majority of comments in the press and on the internet every time there is a "new" sketch show unveiled.
Grr! grumble grouch!
Oh dear! What have I done? The old comedy I like is better that the comedy you like debate has slipped by me and onto my computer.
Yeah I watched the first one and it was nothing like I thought I would get from Harry Enfield and Paul Whitehouse, it wasn't bad but they could have done a lot better.
Lets hope it gets better as the weeks go on!
"pet Geordie: we all have Geordie work colleagues, especiialy in my neck of the woods, and this is priceless material for winding them up"
Loved that one, my best friends a geordie... I don't need a sketch to take the piss out of them thats what ant and dec are for!
That sketch that was set in the gym with that dumbass man, in the track suit was quite good, and so was the pet geordie, i thought it was o.k, it got some bad reviews though.
For a real sketch show, check out Mr Show with Bob and David and be amazed.
Yes, a fellow convert. Have you seen much of Mr Show, I've seen them all and have the DVD boxed set. Best one has to be where they haven't got any complaints so do a song about how the slave trade was ended by a white man and how black people should be grateful. Genius.
Still not got around around to watching last week's episode, but just watching ep 2, and (even though I saw much of it in the studio) am rather enjoying it. Some is a bit hit and miss, but it's not that bad.
And as someone who lives in Notting Hill, I can confirm that there are people who really are like the antiques dealer and his customers.
... And as someone who travels around London a lot, I can also confirm that there really are American tourists who act like that.
Bonos "He don't like Mondays" cracked me up. Fantastic skit. The rest was decent.
I liked the coffee shop, the posh bloke with the totty who turns out to be the boss, Antique shop and the obsessively clean girl with her daddy and Madonna and Guy. In fact more good than bad this week. Or are we getting used to the characters?
Quote: Rick Skelton @ April 20, 2007, 10:10 PMBonos "He don't like Mondays" cracked me up. Fantastic skit. The rest was decent.
Onob.
Haha. I enjoyed it as much as last weeks and i felt it improved quite a bit. The Chocolatier (sp?) was ceepy but very funny.
Oh and did anyone notice Big Suze looking georgous?
The Chocolatier was very Fast Show, it was good though. I do like the American Tourists and Antique Dealer, but the rest were just o.k.
Quote: hotzappa11 @ April 20, 2007, 11:36 PMOh and did anyone notice Big Suze looking georgous?
I wondered why they called her Big Winkleman?
I didn't watch the entire show but the sketches that I saw were very weak.
Quote: Aaron @ April 20, 2007, 11:47 PM
Harry was making the most hilarious comments and facial expressions regarding her whilst filming that scene. He really is a dirty old man.
She's also the younger half-sister of TV's Claudia Winkleman.
for me it's a 50% hit mark. My main gripe with this and many other sketch shows is the constant repetition of skits that should be one offs. like the notting hill antiques shop. sure it's funny once, but when presented with the twelfth version...yes we all saw it coming.
I think if you have a sketch where the humour is principally derived from character (such as Ralph and Ted, Swiss Tony of Fast Show fame) there's no harm in multiple sketches. But when the sketch isn't so reliant on the characters, like the Notting Hill antique shop, it suffers from constant repetition.
Sometimes that can be down to budget constraints though can't it. I'm not necessarily talking about that sketch in particular but often sketch shows probably pay to travel to a location or to build a set and have to get their money's worth. Therefore you might get one or two inspired ideas and some tired stuff.
I really don't like it. I disliked episode 1, so I thought I'd give it one more chance last night, and it was pretty bad. I am a huge fan of "Harry Enfield and Chums", but this is rubbish. It seems very obvious humour to me, such as the fat kids, it's just not funny. The only one I like is the Jose Mouriniho one. And well, the antique dealer who says to that woman "I saw you coming", is also abysmally unfunny.
Ted and Ralph developed. Probably some of these will too. We'll wait and see. It's still better than lots of other shows.
That other woman from Peep Show was in it too, the one from the shoe shop that Mark followed to university.
I only really like the Surgeons and the American Tourists. Isn't she probably pretty?
Hee.
I've only watched the first programme so far, but it seemed pretty dated to me. If the second programme's no better (I've recorded it), that's probably as good as it gets.
Anyone seen any reviews in the press? I can't imagine they're going to be too favourable.
Quote: Jack Massey @ April 21, 2007, 11:22 AM...such as the fat kids, it's just not funny.
i agree it is a hit and miss show i love the sketches with the builders that seem to defy the stereo type then turn into it to test the public, it is very funny, and also the "jose arrogantes" sketches are quite funny but the there is the jamie & oliver sketch, just not funny and just pointless, the nelson mandella sketches are quite funny, especially the last mines like "lets get muntered".
The Jamie & Oliver sketch looks like a French & Saunders one.
Lewis, can you shorten your signature please? It's a bit needlessly long at the moment!
crap i didn't realise it was a essay, it always looks shorter in the little box, it is done, sorry.
.
Thankies. 
Didn't like episode 1, gave it one more week, episode 2 was worse, so I'm not watching it tonight.
I missed most of tonight's - distracted but not in a good way. I'll watch the repeat on Monday.
Still liking the, "I saw you coming" and the pet Geordie sketches.
I thought episode 2 was excellent, but Friday's was diabolically bad. I felt embarrassed to be watching it. I don't think I'll bother next week.
This show is doing very little for me, I was a big fan of the original Harry E show, if you weren't there you would not know just how big the original show was. There also little doubt that Paul Whitehouse is a comedy genius and a fine actor but can't help thinking their partnership should have been left in the archives.
Give Morwenna Banks her own show.
She had one.
Well, a pilot.
Did you see it?
(It involved rehab and Russell Brand.)
I knew it was on but missed it. Surely she deserves more though.
I can give her some more while you look after Baddiel.
It's a deal.
*Spits on hand and shakes*
Sorry - are you having a fit or something?
Yes.
And I'll thank you not to mock my disability.
You should be able to liven Baddiel up then.
Awful. I hope this gets better. Obviously this was a vehicle because Chris Langham isn't working. Help was a excellent show. Enfield really had some talent. Whitehouse is phenomenal. It goes to show, if this is the best they can come up with, how far a name will get you as opposed to how good the material you produce is...
<insert not bitter icon>
So disappointed, feel like they've tarnished childhood memories because I loved Harry Enfield and Chums when I was growing up, such great characters like Wayne and Waynnette, the old gits, Kevin and Perry, Smashie and Nicie, Its only me, we're considerably richer than you couple, the three liverpoolians and more, they were all great but this show is poor and I really wanted to like it but when you compare it to the fresh talents of Peep show then it looks very shoddy. If anyone remembers Harry Enfield did a show on Sky One after he finished '& Chums' on the BBC and that too was poor.
Its a shame
I've watched 2.5 episodes of 'Ruddy Hell...' and I think it's piss poor.
'I Saw You Coming' is the best thing, but it's just the same sketch with marginally different lines over and over again.
Everything else is abysmal in my opinion.
I quite liked the contrasting builders sketch until now, it's getting tedious, i also like the Didier Pescovitch and Jose Aragantio, sketch until noe, and also the "i saw you coming" is getting boring, i liked it until the last two episodes.
I've got to say i laughed alot at this weeks episode, there was just something about but i can't put my finger on it. The "I Saw You Coming" sketch was again great. Yay, Alice Lowe.
Well, I'm looking forward to this. Don't really agree with the BSG summation that the first series was 'awful'. Lots of good stuff first time round, I thought.
Although it is just called Harry And Paul now, so could be argued to be a different programme...
Yes,I suppose that you could argue that it's a different programme, if you were a paticular tight-arse.
But it isn't, though, is it. It's the same programme with a trimmed down title. Obvi-arsley.
I dunno, I like things to have the same title.
Hope to see the their two surgeon characters back. Think those are wonderfully performed.
Enjoyed the Bourne sketch. And Harrys Deborah Meaden.
Edit; Dedicated to Geoffrey Perkins too. Nice touch.
That was good - same characters, but an improvement on the first series for sure (probably because each sketch was given more time to breath, and characters like the Polish coffee shop girl given more depth?).
Favourite sketches were the 'Saw You Coming Shop' - always loved that - and Dragons' Den (most notably the impressions of Evan Davis and Deborah Meaden)
What was up with that Writer & Landlady sketch? I think I missed a cultural reference there?
Also, as Nil says, the dedication at the end was a nice touch.
I agree. Much better than the first series.
I missed the cultural reference of the Writer & Landlady sketch, but still found it very funny.
I liked the choclateer sketch, although it did remind me of The 13th Duke of Wynbourne from The Fast Show. What else? Oh the football one and a couple of others.
I liked the dedication. In fact, it was more of a tribute.
Very good all round. Lets hope they sustain it over the rest of the series.
Much better than the first series but then again I really did like the first series.
In this episode I liked chocolate sketch, football manager sketch, saw you coming (but I always do), what else, uh... beware of the northerner and the radio 3 dj's (noticed Whitehouse using the voice of Monty from "Help.") The coffee shop sketch could have been better. It's also nice to see Alice Lowe.
The dedication to GP was nice to.
Liked it - didn't get the writer/landlady sketch either
or some shit
Weather was so stormy here that the TV signal cut out half way through, so I shall have to download it, BUT what I saw was great. Even my Mrs was chuckling away.
Did feel like the bastard lovechild of Help at times, with some of the voices (and indeed character visuals), but that's never a bad thing. Please make more of that, someone! With Langham, obviously.
Tonight's episode was a load of bollocking shit shite.
Good on them doing the dedication as people have said.
Will stick with the it, personally loved the landlady sketch, thought it was the highlight of the show, along with the football manager one.
But didn't laugh at the many cheap shots at foreigners. And surely the 'old men liking hip hop' is lifted straight from I'm Sorry I've Got No Head?
Quote: Stan Doubt @ September 5 2008, 10:31 PM BST
But didn't laugh at the many cheap shots at foreigners.
Theo is of foreign origin - let's give him a silly turkish accent! That'll raise some laughs! Annoyed me a little.
Quote: Stan Doubt @ September 5 2008, 10:41 PM BSTTheo is of foreign origin - let's give him a silly turkish accent! That'll raise some laughs! Annoyed me a little.
Yeah, it's a shame, cos they'd nailed all his mannerisms perfectly.
Quote: Stan Doubt @ September 5 2008, 10:31 PM BSTAnd surely the 'old men liking hip hop' is lifted straight from I'm Sorry I've Got No Head?
Cool, if I think the I'm Sorry I've Got No Head one was recorded first, that makes it true. Woohoo!
I only saw one sketch, but it was jolly good!
I liked the geezer in the shop with the posh birds.
Quote: zooo @ September 5 2008, 11:54 PM BSTit was jolly good!
It's what I'm aiming for!
Quote: Charley @ September 5 2008, 11:57 PM BSTI liked the geezer in the shop with the posh birds.
I wasn't so keen on the Armstrong & Miller. Turned it over after 5 minutes. 
Quote: Stan Doubt @ September 5 2008, 11:48 PM BSTCool, if I think the I'm Sorry I've Got No Head one was recorded first, that makes it true. Woohoo!
Quote: Charley @ September 6 2008, 12:05 AM BSTI wasn't so keen on the Armstrong & Miller. Turned it over after 5 minutes.
just watched 15 min on iplayer, I may be pissed but it wasn't funny.
I think it was a big improvement. I think series one suffered from a mix of being outdated and having to many 'sexist' ideas. This just seemed to bring back their past success. About the only ones I could do without are the Polish coffee shop and Nelson Mandella.
I enjoyed that overall. The opening team-talk in different languages was good and the Dragons Den one too. I thought the 'did you see that play' sketch was observed very well, I know people just like that.
Are these the same characters that were in 'Ruddy Hell it's...'? - I didn't realise it was a follow on from that. Never saw it.
Some are. The antiques bloke, the posh workmen, the guy in the gym & the coffee shop bloke, to name a few, were all from the last series.
Hopefully they've killed off the poorer characters, like The Clean Chavs. I am glad they kept the Chocolater though 
Probably should make a new thread for this...
http://www.comedy.co.uk/forums/thread/9117
Wanted so much more 
Thought it should of been so much better, fact is, it was (overall) pants, but folks will say it was pretty good 'cos they probably think they should!
I just learned on Chortle that Harry & Paul is being given a third series, but it has been demoted to BBC Two because of poor ratings and it will get rid of their studio audience.
http://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2009/09/23/9665/bbc_one_fires_harry_enfield
Quote: Ian Wolf @ September 23 2009, 1:55 PM BSTI just learned on Chortle that Harry & Paul is being given a third series, but it has been demoted to BBC Two because of poor ratings and it will get rid of their studio audience.
http://www.chortle.co.uk/news/2009/09/23/9665/bbc_one_fires_harry_enfield
Don't really see why anybody would view this as a relegation as such.
BBC2 has always been more of a fertile ground for that kind of comedy. Although, having said that, it's a shame they don't feel it to be a suitable show for BBC1, given the lack of any decent comedy on the channel.
As least there will be another series. Still no word on a new Stewart Lee series yet.
Quote: chipolata @ September 23 2009, 1:57 PM BSTNot sure it'll work as well without a studio audience. Whitehouse and Enfield are best bouncing off an audience. And this will be the first series with Geoffrey Perkins, which is worrying.
Quote: Ian Wolf @ September 23 2009, 2:27 PM BSTActually Perkins only produced the second of the two series so far. The first was produced by Phil Bowker. (See Harry & Paul - Production Details, Plus Regular Cast and Crew)
Quote: chipolata @ September 23 2009, 2:29 PM BST(And nice to see your still alive, Ian - I don't see you as much with the tragic demise of the "Current radio comedy" thread!)
Quote: Ian Wolf @ September 23 2009, 1:55 PM BSTit will get rid of their studio audience.
Quote: Aaron @ September 23 2009, 3:08 PM BST
What do you think it means? 
Quote: Aaron @ September 23 2009, 3:34 PM BSTWhat do you think it means?
I'm surprise anyone needs to ask, but for the record:
"WTF?!!!!!!" is roughly what it means.
Quote: Aaron @ September 23 2009, 4:17 PM BSTI'm surprise anyone needs to ask, but for the record:
"WTF?!!!!!!" is roughly what it means.
Because that would have taken more effort than one click, and I didn't imagine that there would be any confusion! Gah! 
Quote: chipolata @ September 23 2009, 1:57 PM BSTAnd this will be the first series with Geoffrey Perkins, which is worrying.
Quote: Ian Wolf @ September 23 2009, 4:32 PM BSTOh right!
Why didn't you just type "WTF?"
Quote: Aaron @ September 23 2009, 4:44 PM BSTBecause that would have taken more effort than one click, and I didn't imagine that there would be any confusion! Gah!
Quote: luke not going out to have two pints @ September 23 2009, 7:05 PM BST